The last issue of Progressive Pork included
a report on a three-year study by the University of Illinois to
look at options for managing wean-to-finish facilities. The topic
continues to be something Farmweld is watching closely. Here are
results from another study concluded at the University of Nebraska.
Scientists at the University of Nebraska
found that during the nursery phase, pigs raised in single-stocked,
wean-to-finish facilities perform better than pigs raised in double-stocked,
wean-to-finish facilities or in a traditional system where pigs
are started in a nursery, then moved to a finishing facility. Dr.
Michael C. Brumm led the research, which compared the following
specific management systems over three consecutive trials:
- Wean-to-finish (WF).Pigs were weaned
into grow-finish pens and stocked at 7.5 sq. ft. (.70 m2)/pig
from weaning to slaughtering.
- Double-stock/wean-to-finish. (DS/WF)
Pigs were weaned into grow-finish pens at twice the rate (3.75
sq. ft./pig or .35m2/pig) of the first group. At eight
weeks after weaning, pigs were randomly sorted into two groups.
One group remained in the same pen and the other group was relocated
to another empty pen in the same facility. All the pigs were then
raised to slaughter at a 7.5 sq. ft./pig (.70m2/pig).
- Pigs were weaned into a nursery and stocked
at a rate of 3.75 sq. ft./pig (.35 m2/pig) until eight
weeks. They were then moved to the finisher (same facility as
pigs in first and second group) and raised to slaughter at 7.5
sq. ft./pig (.70 m2/pig).
The research was conducted at Nebraskas
Haskell Ag Laboratory near Concord. The grow-finish facility is
a double-wide, naturally ventilated building with full cement slatting.
The nursery is mechanically ventilated with unvented heaters and
woven wire flooring. There were 15 pigs per pen for the WF and NF
treatments and 30 pigs per pen in the DS/WF group for the first
eight weeks.
There was one, two-hole Farmweld Jumbo Feeder
and one Farmweld DRIK-O-MAT® Water Cup for every 15 pigs. Heat
lamps were used as supplemental heat for the WF and the DS/WF groups
and comfort mats were used for all three groups. A commercially-available
nursery diet sequence was used to 40 pounds (18.2 kg) of bodyweight
based on a pre-planned feed budget. Grow-finish rations were corn-soybean
based with 2% added fat, formulated according to lysine requirements
for five feeding stages.
All pigs were weaned at 17 days weighing an average
of 11.2 lbs. (5.1 kg). Each were barrow offspring of PIC genetic
crosses. In Trials 1 and 2, an outbreak of gut edema occurred during
weeks two through four. It was most severe in the WF and DS/WF groups.
In Trial 1, only the WF and the DS/WF pigs were treated. In Trial
2, all pigs were treated. No gut edema occurred in Trial 3 so pigs
were not treated. Pigs in Trial 1 and 2 also had health challenges
due to complications associated with PRRS.
Despite the health concerns mentioned above, the
WF pigs performed better than the DS/WF or NF pigs during the nursery
phase. This was due to greater feed intake with faster daily gains.
According to Brumm, the lower performance of the DS/WF group compared
to the WF group was likely due to the increased number of pigs per
pen. There is good evidence that increasing group sizes (in the
range of group sizes studied) results in a decrease in daily feed
consumption and gain. The researchers also noted that it is possible
that the industry is seeing improvements in performance in wean-to-finish
units compared to conventional nurseries because many conventional
nurseries offer inadequate space and feeder size for heavier pigs
now common in nurseries. Performance did not differ among the three
groups during the grow-finish period.
Impact of wean-to-finish regimen on pig performance
| |
WF |
DS/WF |
NF |
| No. pens |
12 |
12 |
12 |
| Weaning wt. lb. |
11.2
(5.1 kg) |
11.2
(5.1 kg) |
11.2
(5.1 kg) |
| 56 day wt. lb. |
63.1
(28.7 kg) |
59.2
(26.9 kg) |
60.9
(27.68 kg) |
| Ave. Daily Gain, lb. |
0.92
(.42 kg)
|
0.86
(.39 kg) |
0.89
(.40 kg) |
| Ave. Daily Intake, lb. |
1.53
(.70 kg) |
1.42
(.65 kg) |
1.47
(.67 kg) |
| Feed:Gain |
1.66 |
1.66 |
1.64 |
| |
WF |
DS/WF
-S |
DS/WF
- M |
NF |
| Ave. weight when first pigs were sold @ 250
lbs. |
224.8
(102.2 kg) |
217.3
(98.8 kg) |
220.5
(100.23 kg) |
220.7
(100.3 kg) |
| Ave. Daily Gain |
1.88
(.85 kg) |
1.88
(.85 kg) |
1.85
(.84 kg) |
1.85
(.84 kg) |
| Ave. Daily Feed |
4.91
(2.23 kg) |
4.88
(2.22 kg) |
4.88
(2.22 kg) |
4.88
(2.22 kg) |
| Feed:Gain |
2.61 |
2.61 |
2.60 |
2.64 |
Key
WF= Wean-to-Finish
DS/WF = Double Stocked, Wean-to-finish
NF= Nursery Moved to Wean-to-Finish
DS/WF - S= Double Stocked, Wean-to-finish - Pigs
remaining in same pen throughout trial
DS/WF - M= Double Stocked, Wean-to-finish --
Pigs moved to new pen in same facility
For further information on this research, you
can download a PDF file from NU Institute of Agriculture and Natural
Resources which can be read with and Adobe Acrobat reader.
Click here to download the PDF file.
|