The last issue of Progressive Pork included
a report on a three-year study by the University of Illinois
to look at options for managing wean-to-finish facilities.
The topic continues to be something Farmweld is watching closely.
Here are results from another study concluded at the University
of Nebraska.
Scientists at the University of Nebraska
found that during the nursery phase, pigs raised in single-stocked,
wean-to-finish facilities perform better than pigs raised
in double-stocked, wean-to-finish facilities or in a traditional
system where pigs are started in a nursery, then moved to
a finishing facility. Dr. Michael C. Brumm led the research,
which compared the following specific management systems over
three consecutive trials:
- Wean-to-finish (WF).Pigs were weaned
into grow-finish pens and stocked at 7.5 sq. ft. (.70 m2)/pig
from weaning to slaughtering.
- Double-stock/wean-to-finish. (DS/WF)
Pigs were weaned into grow-finish pens at twice the rate (3.75
sq. ft./pig or .35m2/pig) of the first group. At eight
weeks after weaning, pigs were randomly sorted into two groups.
One group remained in the same pen and the other group was relocated
to another empty pen in the same facility. All the pigs were then
raised to slaughter at a 7.5 sq. ft./pig (.70m2/pig).
- Pigs were weaned into a nursery and stocked
at a rate of 3.75 sq. ft./pig (.35 m2/pig) until eight
weeks. They were then moved to the finisher (same facility as
pigs in first and second group) and raised to slaughter at 7.5
sq. ft./pig (.70 m2/pig).
The research was conducted at Nebraskas
Haskell Ag Laboratory near Concord. The grow-finish facility
is a double-wide, naturally ventilated building with full
cement slatting. The nursery is mechanically ventilated with
unvented heaters and woven wire flooring. There were 15 pigs
per pen for the WF and NF treatments and 30 pigs per pen in
the DS/WF group for the first eight weeks.
There was one, two-hole Farmweld Jumbo Feeder
and one Farmweld DRIK-O-MAT® Water Cup for every 15 pigs.
Heat lamps were used as supplemental heat for the WF and the
DS/WF groups and comfort mats were used for all three groups.
A commercially-available nursery diet sequence was used to
40 pounds (18.2 kg) of bodyweight based on a pre-planned feed
budget. Grow-finish rations were corn-soybean based with 2%
added fat, formulated according to lysine requirements for
five feeding stages.
All pigs were weaned at 17 days weighing
an average of 11.2 lbs. (5.1 kg). Each were barrow offspring
of PIC genetic crosses. In Trials 1 and 2, an outbreak of
gut edema occurred during weeks two through four. It was most
severe in the WF and DS/WF groups. In Trial 1, only the WF
and the DS/WF pigs were treated. In Trial 2, all pigs were
treated. No gut edema occurred in Trial 3 so pigs were not
treated. Pigs in Trial 1 and 2 also had health challenges
due to complications associated with PRRS.
Despite the health concerns mentioned above,
the WF pigs performed better than the DS/WF or NF pigs during
the nursery phase. This was due to greater feed intake with
faster daily gains. According to Brumm, the lower performance
of the DS/WF group compared to the WF group was likely due
to the increased number of pigs per pen. There is good evidence
that increasing group sizes (in the range of group sizes studied)
results in a decrease in daily feed consumption and gain.
The researchers also noted that it is possible that the industry
is seeing improvements in performance in wean-to-finish units
compared to conventional nurseries because many conventional
nurseries offer inadequate space and feeder size for heavier
pigs now common in nurseries. Performance did not differ among
the three groups during the grow-finish period.
Impact of wean-to-finish regimen on pig
performance
| |
WF |
DS/WF |
NF |
| No. pens |
12 |
12 |
12 |
| Weaning wt. lb. |
11.2
(5.1 kg) |
11.2
(5.1 kg) |
11.2
(5.1 kg) |
| 56 day wt. lb. |
63.1
(28.7 kg) |
59.2
(26.9 kg) |
60.9
(27.68 kg) |
| Ave. Daily Gain,
lb. |
0.92
(.42 kg)
|
0.86
(.39 kg) |
0.89
(.40 kg) |
| Ave. Daily Intake, lb. |
1.53
(.70 kg) |
1.42
(.65 kg) |
1.47
(.67 kg) |
| Feed:Gain |
1.66 |
1.66 |
1.64 |
| |
WF |
DS/WF
-S |
DS/WF
- M |
NF |
| Ave. weight when first pigs were sold
@ 250 lbs. |
224.8
(102.2 kg) |
217.3
(98.8 kg) |
220.5
(100.23 kg) |
220.7
(100.3 kg) |
| Ave. Daily Gain |
1.88
(.85 kg) |
1.88
(.85 kg) |
1.85
(.84 kg) |
1.85
(.84 kg) |
| Ave. Daily Feed |
4.91
(2.23 kg) |
4.88
(2.22 kg) |
4.88
(2.22 kg) |
4.88
(2.22 kg) |
| Feed:Gain |
2.61 |
2.61 |
2.60 |
2.64 |
Key
WF= Wean-to-Finish
DS/WF = Double Stocked, Wean-to-finish
NF= Nursery Moved to Wean-to-Finish
DS/WF - S= Double Stocked, Wean-to-finish
- Pigs remaining in same pen throughout trial
DS/WF - M= Double Stocked, Wean-to-finish
-- Pigs moved to new pen in same facility
|