|
According to agricultural engineer and
livestock environment consultant Terry Feldmann, East Peoria,
IL, you can expect to save anywhere from .23 to 1.5 cents
in application costs for each gallon of manure you don't have
to handle. Storage costs can also be reduced, in addition
to the basic water supply costs.
Feldmann estimates that manure handling
costs range from .23 cents per gallon for simple irrigation
systems up to 1.5 cents per gallon for tanker systems with
long travel distances to fields. Umbilical or drag systems
range from .5 to .8 cents per gallon, Feldmann says.
According to University of Nebraska research,
pigs on Farmweld DRIK-0-MAT® Water Cups use about 1.0
gallon per day per pig, compared to 1.33 per day per pig for
pigs on swinging nipple waterers. So if you cut water waste
by 25 percent from 1.33 to 1.0 gallons per day
you'll save $964 in a year's time if you use an umbilical
system to apply manure from a 1,000-head finishing building.
| Annual Manure
Application Cost Savings |
 |
| .33 gal. Savings/day |
| x 1,000 head
x 365 days; |
| x $.008 application
cost |
| =
$964 annual savings |
Another research trial at Nebraska showed
that pigs on standard nipple waterers used 1.6 gallons of
water per day. That translates into a $1,752 savings in annual
application costs using an umbilical system if you reduce
water use to 1.0 gallon per day.
| Annual Manure
Application Cost Savings |
 |
| .6 gal. Savings/day |
| x 1,000 head
x 365 days |
| x $.008 application
cost |
| =
$1,752 annual savings |
Adjust these examples to match your specific
application method and your system's building capacity and
number of operating days.
Feldmann says that daily water use also
impacts the amount of manure storage your operation requires.
For example, say you were planning to build a 12 ft. deep,
200 ft. diameter round concrete outdoor storage tank, which
would hold 2.8 million gallons of waste. If you reduce total
water use by 25 percent, you'd require 2.1 million gallons
capacity and could get away with a 173 ft. diameter tank instead
of the 200 ft. tank.
Feldmann estimates storage tank building
costs at $.0475 per gallon. The 173 ft. tank would cost $99,750,
compared to $133,000 for a 200 ft. tank. This example is for
areas where rainfall is equal to evaporation and should be
adjusted in areas where rainfall exceeds evaporation.
| Concrete Storage
Tank Building Costs |
 |
| 200 ft. tank
= 2.8 mil gal. X $.0475/gal. = $133,000 |
| 173 ft. tank
= 2.1 mil gal. $0475/gal. = $99,750 |
| =
$33,250 savings |
Feldmann says that reducing water waste
also reduces water supply costs. The impact depends on your
specific supply costs. If you operate in an area where it
is expensive to obtain water, then obviously you'll save more.
Furthermore, Feldmann says that reducing your water supply
requirement could help you avoid fines if you operate in an
area where daily use restrictions are established.
Reducing daily water waste helps cut manure
application cost, storage cost and water supply cost. And
all of that makes good economic sense, says Feldmann.
|