|
According to agricultural engineer and
livestock environment consultant Terry Feldmann, East Peoria, IL,
you can expect to save anywhere from .23 to 1.5 cents in application
costs for each gallon of manure you don't have to handle. Storage
costs can also be reduced, in addition to the basic water supply
costs.
Feldmann estimates that manure handling costs range from .23 cents
per gallon for simple irrigation systems up to 1.5 cents per gallon
for tanker systems with long travel distances to fields. Umbilical
or drag systems range from .5 to .8 cents per gallon, Feldmann says.
According to University of Nebraska research, pigs on Farmweld
DRIK-0-MAT® Water Cups use about 1.0 gallon per day per pig,
compared to 1.33 per day per pig for pigs on swinging nipple waterers.
So if you cut water waste by 25 percent from 1.33 to 1.0
gallons per day you'll save $964 in a year's time if you
use an umbilical system to apply manure from a 1,000-head finishing
building.
| Annual Manure Application
Cost Savings |
 |
| .33 gal. Savings/day |
| x 1,000 head x 365
days; |
| x $.008 application
cost |
| = $964
annual savings |
Another research trial at Nebraska showed that pigs on standard
nipple waterers used 1.6 gallons of water per day. That translates
into a $1,752 savings in annual application costs using an umbilical
system if you reduce water use to 1.0 gallon per day.
| Annual Manure Application Cost Savings |
 |
| .6 gal. Savings/day |
| x 1,000 head x 365 days |
| x $.008 application cost |
| = $1,752 annual savings |
Adjust these examples to match your specific application method
and your system's building capacity and number of operating days.
Feldmann says that daily water use also impacts the amount of manure
storage your operation requires. For example, say you were planning
to build a 12 ft. deep, 200 ft. diameter round concrete outdoor
storage tank, which would hold 2.8 million gallons of waste. If
you reduce total water use by 25 percent, you'd require 2.1 million
gallons capacity and could get away with a 173 ft. diameter tank
instead of the 200 ft. tank.
Feldmann estimates storage tank building costs at $.0475 per gallon.
The 173 ft. tank would cost $99,750, compared to $133,000 for a
200 ft. tank. This example is for areas where rainfall is equal
to evaporation and should be adjusted in areas where rainfall exceeds
evaporation.
| Concrete Storage Tank Building Costs |
 |
| 200 ft. tank = 2.8 mil gal. X $.0475/gal. = $133,000 |
| 173 ft. tank = 2.1 mil gal. $0475/gal. = $99,750 |
| =
$33,250 savings |
Feldmann says that reducing water waste also reduces water supply
costs. The impact depends on your specific supply costs. If you
operate in an area where it is expensive to obtain water, then obviously
you'll save more. Furthermore, Feldmann says that reducing your
water supply requirement could help you avoid fines if you operate
in an area where daily use restrictions are established.
Reducing daily water waste helps cut manure application cost, storage
cost and water supply cost. And all of that makes good economic
sense, says Feldmann.
>
|